The thesis analyzes the relationship between the concept of the American Dream and the development of suburban residential areas (suburbs) in the United States. Through a long-term perspective, from the colonial period to September 11, 2001, the research traces the economic, social, and political forces that contributed to the progressive association between Suburbia and the American ideal of life. It also examines the role of residential urban planning both as an instrument of American soft power and as an expression of social mobility and consumer culture. The theoretical analysis compares the concentric zone model developed by the Chicago School with the interpretations of the Los Angeles School, highlighting the evolution of the American city and its residential spaces. Particular attention is devoted to public policies supporting homeownership, the role of private corporations, and the spread of consumerism. Gentrification is also examined as a form of transformation of the city’s “internal frontier,” in contrast with the outward expansion of the suburbs. The findings highlight how, despite its transformations and contradictions, Suburbia became one of the principal spatial manifestations of the American Dream.
L’elaborato analizza il rapporto tra il concetto di American Dream e lo sviluppo dei quartieri residenziali suburbani (suburbs) negli Stati Uniti. Attraverso una prospettiva di lungo periodo, dal periodo coloniale all’11 settembre 2001, la ricerca ricostruisce le forze economiche, sociali e politiche che hanno contribuito alla progressiva associazione tra suburbia e ideale di vita americano. L’analisi considera inoltre il ruolo dell’urbanistica residenziale sia come strumento di soft power statunitense, sia come espressione delle dinamiche di mobilità sociale e dei modelli di consumo della società americana. Il percorso teorico mette a confronto il modello dei cerchi concentrici della Scuola di Chicago e le interpretazioni della Scuola di Los Angeles, evidenziando l’evoluzione della città americana e dei suoi spazi residenziali. Particolare attenzione è dedicata alle politiche pubbliche di sostegno all’acquisto della casa, al ruolo delle imprese private e alla diffusione del consumismo. La gentrificazione viene inoltre analizzata come forma di trasformazione della “frontiera interna” della città, in contrapposizione all’espansione suburbana. I risultati evidenziano come, pur attraverso trasformazioni e contraddizioni, i suburbs siano divenuti una delle principali manifestazioni spaziali dell’American Dream.
The House I Live In. A History of Suburbia and the American Dream.
KOMPARE, DEMETRIO
2025/2026
Abstract
The thesis analyzes the relationship between the concept of the American Dream and the development of suburban residential areas (suburbs) in the United States. Through a long-term perspective, from the colonial period to September 11, 2001, the research traces the economic, social, and political forces that contributed to the progressive association between Suburbia and the American ideal of life. It also examines the role of residential urban planning both as an instrument of American soft power and as an expression of social mobility and consumer culture. The theoretical analysis compares the concentric zone model developed by the Chicago School with the interpretations of the Los Angeles School, highlighting the evolution of the American city and its residential spaces. Particular attention is devoted to public policies supporting homeownership, the role of private corporations, and the spread of consumerism. Gentrification is also examined as a form of transformation of the city’s “internal frontier,” in contrast with the outward expansion of the suburbs. The findings highlight how, despite its transformations and contradictions, Suburbia became one of the principal spatial manifestations of the American Dream.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
KOMPARE_DEMETRIO_905310.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
13.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
13.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14247/30979