The thesis analyses the representation of London as a narrative and symbolic space in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Alan Moore and David Lloyd's V for Vendetta, together with their film adaptations (Radford, 1984; McTeigue, 2005). The aim is to show how the city is not a mere background, but an ideological construction that reflects and produces collective imaginaries. Orwell's grey and timeless London becomes a universal metaphor of totalitarianism, while Moore and Lloyd's recognisable but transfigured city is configured as a stage of repression and revolt. In films, such visions are translated through photography and color: desaturated and oppressive in Radford, spectacular and revolutionary in McTeigue. The analysis thus highlights the city as an active narrative device, capable of redefining the relationship between urban space, power and identity.
The thesis analyses the representation of London as a narrative and symbolic space in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Alan Moore and David Lloyd's V for Vendetta, together with their film adaptations (Radford, 1984; McTeigue, 2005). The aim is to show how the city is not a mere background, but an ideological construction that reflects and produces collective imaginaries. Orwell's grey and timeless London becomes a universal metaphor of totalitarianism, while Moore and Lloyd's recognisable but transfigured city is configured as a stage of repression and revolt. In films, such visions are translated through photography and color: desaturated and oppressive in Radford, spectacular and revolutionary in McTeigue. The analysis thus highlights the city as an active narrative device, capable of redefining the relationship between urban space, power and identity.
London in Orwell’s 1984 and Moore and Lloyd’s V for Vendetta and their film adaptations
VITALE, ANASTASIA
2024/2025
Abstract
The thesis analyses the representation of London as a narrative and symbolic space in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Alan Moore and David Lloyd's V for Vendetta, together with their film adaptations (Radford, 1984; McTeigue, 2005). The aim is to show how the city is not a mere background, but an ideological construction that reflects and produces collective imaginaries. Orwell's grey and timeless London becomes a universal metaphor of totalitarianism, while Moore and Lloyd's recognisable but transfigured city is configured as a stage of repression and revolt. In films, such visions are translated through photography and color: desaturated and oppressive in Radford, spectacular and revolutionary in McTeigue. The analysis thus highlights the city as an active narrative device, capable of redefining the relationship between urban space, power and identity.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LONDON IN CINEMA PDFA LI.pdf
embargo fino al 06/04/2028
Dimensione
9.7 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.7 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14247/28642