In my work I evaluate the performance of different VaR approaches applied on three stock market indexes. The estimation of these risk measures is compared and back-tested, in order to fulfill regulatory requirements from Basel Committee. The back-testing results highlight that the Historical Simulation, Filtered Historic Simulation and RiskMetrics underperform compared with the GARCH-N and GJR-T models; the first ones show the highest percentage of failure and remain in the red and yellow zone of the Basel II categorization tests.

Empirical Study of Value-at-Risk: application of different methodologies to Asian stock market indexes

Guerriero, Carmine
2016/2017

Abstract

In my work I evaluate the performance of different VaR approaches applied on three stock market indexes. The estimation of these risk measures is compared and back-tested, in order to fulfill regulatory requirements from Basel Committee. The back-testing results highlight that the Historical Simulation, Filtered Historic Simulation and RiskMetrics underperform compared with the GARCH-N and GJR-T models; the first ones show the highest percentage of failure and remain in the red and yellow zone of the Basel II categorization tests.
2016-03-08
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
848688-1191108.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 2.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.2 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14247/2090