In my work I evaluate the performance of different VaR approaches applied on three stock market indexes. The estimation of these risk measures is compared and back-tested, in order to fulfill regulatory requirements from Basel Committee. The back-testing results highlight that the Historical Simulation, Filtered Historic Simulation and RiskMetrics underperform compared with the GARCH-N and GJR-T models; the first ones show the highest percentage of failure and remain in the red and yellow zone of the Basel II categorization tests.
Empirical Study of Value-at-Risk: application of different methodologies to Asian stock market indexes
Guerriero, Carmine
2016/2017
Abstract
In my work I evaluate the performance of different VaR approaches applied on three stock market indexes. The estimation of these risk measures is compared and back-tested, in order to fulfill regulatory requirements from Basel Committee. The back-testing results highlight that the Historical Simulation, Filtered Historic Simulation and RiskMetrics underperform compared with the GARCH-N and GJR-T models; the first ones show the highest percentage of failure and remain in the red and yellow zone of the Basel II categorization tests.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
848688-1191108.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione
2.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14247/2090