Slowness in rapid naming of visual stimuli is a typical problem of both Specific Language Impairment (Miller et al., 2001; Kleemans et al., 2012; McGregor et al., 2002) and Developmental Dyslexia (Swan & Goswami, 1997). Moreover, longitudinal studies (Wolf & Obregon, 1992) confirm the association between image naming deficits in kindergarten and the occurrence of a subsequent reading disorder, showing a particular correlation between slowness in naming tasks and text decoding difficulties, rather than text comprehension difficulties. In this study, a group of Italian dyslexic children with and without SLI were compared with an age-matched group of typically developing children on tasks of rapid naming, written decoding, reading and syntactic comprehension, and clitic production, in order to identify differences and correlations between performances of differently impaired subjects. The theoretical framework was only partially confirmed. The results were interpreted in light of the Double Deficit Hypothesis (Wolf & Bowers, 1999; Wolf & Obregon, 1992, 1997), which was supplemented with a psycholinguistic hypothesis supporting multifactor models of learning disorders.

"Rapid Naming, Reading, Comprehension, and Syntactic Production by Italian Dyslexic Children with and without Specific Language Impairment".

Casani, Emanuele
2017/2018

Abstract

Slowness in rapid naming of visual stimuli is a typical problem of both Specific Language Impairment (Miller et al., 2001; Kleemans et al., 2012; McGregor et al., 2002) and Developmental Dyslexia (Swan & Goswami, 1997). Moreover, longitudinal studies (Wolf & Obregon, 1992) confirm the association between image naming deficits in kindergarten and the occurrence of a subsequent reading disorder, showing a particular correlation between slowness in naming tasks and text decoding difficulties, rather than text comprehension difficulties. In this study, a group of Italian dyslexic children with and without SLI were compared with an age-matched group of typically developing children on tasks of rapid naming, written decoding, reading and syntactic comprehension, and clitic production, in order to identify differences and correlations between performances of differently impaired subjects. The theoretical framework was only partially confirmed. The results were interpreted in light of the Double Deficit Hypothesis (Wolf & Bowers, 1999; Wolf & Obregon, 1992, 1997), which was supplemented with a psycholinguistic hypothesis supporting multifactor models of learning disorders.
2017-07-04
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
861105-1216255.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 1.77 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.77 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14247/20869